Linux Hardware

June 13, 2008

Why I Love Asus

The Eee PC is an awesome little laptop, very capable and very portable. On top of that, it's got enough fans to generate its own version of Ubuntu.

That's fine for being mobile, but not so great for home. I've been wishing for years for a nice (sufficient resources to do real desktop computing) small (book-size) low-power (= less noisy) and inexpensive ($300) desktop computer.

It seems that Asus has been working on it: the rumor mills are reporing about Asus' newest non-mobile computer (for example, ASUS Eee Box B202 Details Emerge).

The details are appealing: the base system (1Gb RAM, 80Gb disk) for $270 with Linux;
for another $30 you get XP--or Linux, but with 2Gb RAM, 160Gb disk.

If anything will herald the Year of Desktop Linux, this is it. Because for the past decade, we've been reading articles about how to re-purpose your old, obsolete hardware with Linux, or like this one: Build a $150 Linux PC, from Wired. The problem with old and cheap hardware is that it's old, and cheap. You can have Linux, but you won't have wireless, you will have iffy power supplies, noisy (and old and small) hard drives, and big big big boxes.

These new PCs should do very well. I wonder whether they'll be successful enough to prompt Apple to roll out a Linux version of iTunes, finally.

January 04, 2008

OSes for old (really old) PCs

It's amazing what can bubble up from forums; consider this: Operating systems for really, really old computers from the Ubuntu forums.

What a great list! The poster (darrelljon)  lists a few dozen little operating systems, mostly but not all Linux, that are small and light enough to run on older computers. Sorted by size, and in subcategories depending on what media they'll fit on. With links! Awesome!

January 02, 2008

Dell and HP on Linux

Both Dell and HP officially support Linux. Compare Dell and Linux and Open Source and Linux from HP. But Dell also has Dell Linux Engineering Web and Dell Home & Home Office Ubuntu pages.

So, it might appear Dell is a better source if you want to buy hardware with Linux installed. And maybe that's the case, going by the rest of the web. First off, there's this: The LXer Interview: John Hull of Dell a conversation with John Hull, manager of the Dell Linux Engineering team, who talked about things like getting hardware driver support in Linux.

Dell is getting the Linux desktop job done, apparently. For example, one of the big issues with Ubuntu is getting it to play DVDs, right out of the box. Not possible with vanilla Ubuntu, but Dell has gone ahead and fixed that (in other words, adding value for their customers). Linux Update: Ubuntu 7.10 and Built-In DVD playback. Read the article, because it points out other added value Dell provides with their Ubuntu installs, as well as pointing out how customers made the suggestions--and Dell listed to them.

If I were in the market for a new PC, dude, I'd be getting a Dell.

Not an HP. Because there's this from Matt Parnell: Gee, Thanks HP...Your Support Stinks! Now, HP hardware is probably just as good as Dell's, but it turns out that they're still relying on the old "unsupported software voids our responsibility for fixing bugs" excuse. Matt quoted a response he got from HP Total Care when he reported a BIOS bug, and it's just too good not to repeat here:

HP does not recommend installing of Linux Operating System, it could not guarantee a high level of compatibility for all basic hardware and software components of the PCs.

Now, I realize that this is just a semi-automated response from the outsourced tech support team, and it probably doesn't accurately reflect the corporate message that HP wants to send--but it sends a strong message to anyone who might ever want to consider using Linux.